The throughput calculator
Drag the sliders to match your team. The maths updates live.
Assumes Dimply cuts build time by about 80%. Your results will vary.
A quarter in the life
The roadmap is twice as long as the team can build. Priorities get cut before they get started.
The quarterly review needs a story. Most quarters, there’s nothing shipped to point at.
Ship once, and it slides to the bottom of the backlog for optimisation. Nobody owns what’s live.
The people closest to the customer can’t build. Any change queues behind engineering, security and compliance.
The team ships the roadmap you actually wrote, no new hire plan attached.
Every review opens with journeys that went live, and the numbers behind them.
The team that built it keeps improving it. Ownership never leaves product.
Product builds it directly, and compliance signs it off in the same pipeline.
The case you need to make
Your CTO
Your CFO
Engineering lead
I’m not inheriting another black box my team has to support.
Journeys are versioned, exportable, and run on the data, calculations and access controls engineering already governs. Nothing ships that your CTO can’t see, roll back, or audit.
Why not just hire more engineers?
Because throughput isn’t a headcount problem. The product team you already have ships in days instead of quarters, closing the roadmap gap without growing the hire plan or the run-rate.
This becomes shadow IT we clean up later.
The opposite. The business builds inside guardrails you set: governed data, custom nodes, open APIs, full observability. Engineering stays in control and stops being the queue for every change.